PHILANTHROPIC CAPACITY-BUILDING RESOURCES
DATABASE - INTERMEDIARY ORGANIZATIONS
Return to
Intermediaries Page
 
Report Title: Intermediary Profile Report
Report Date:

Organization:
 

KAL

Program ID Number: I-29

Date Profile Created:
 


June 29, 2009

Date Profile
Last Updated:
July 30, 2009


Program Summary:
Fieldstone Alliance and Nonprofit Finance Fund (both profiled separately in the intermediary section of this database), with financial support of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, work as partners to develop the capacity and financial acumen of U.S.-based W.K. Kellogg Foundation grantees that have an active grant at any point between January 1, 2007-August 31, 2009. This joint effort, known as KAL (formerly the Kellogg Action Lab), is helping nonprofits develop and maintain alignment among mission, organizational capacity and capital. Its goals are to: (1) improve the overall performance, effectiveness and financial sustainability of U.S.-based WKKF grantees; and (2) use the knowledge created in this work to leverage learning about effectiveness and make improvements in performance throughout the nonprofit sector.

An array of flexible services that respond to an organization's specific needs are offered, including financial support, access to expert consultants and access to knowledge resources.

Financial support is provided in three ways. (1) Knowledge Resources: Organizations with annual operating budgets below $1 million receive $750 to purchase knowledge resources (books & publications, conference registration fees, memberships, online resources, subscriptions, etc.) that will strengthen the capacity of their organization as a whole. KAL provides a compendium of especially valuable items and has negotiated discounted prices on some, but grantees are not limited to that list for their purchases; (2) In-person Convenings and Webinars: Organizations with operating budgets of $1 million or less may receive a stipend of up to $500 per person for up to three people to cover travel and lodging costs for a KAL convening. Organizations with operating budgets over $1 million may receive one stipend of up to $500 to cover costs; (3) Grants for Capacity-building Consultations: Organizations may apply for funding to cover such agreed-upon consultations as organizational assessments, strategic planning, financial analysis, business planning, referrals for financing and capital resources, and other opportunities. Fieldstone Alliance's Organizational Assessment and Nonprofit Finance Fund's Nonprofit Business Analysis are among the options available. Some organizations undertake them both in a combination consultation. Upon approval of a consultation grant, organizations pay either $500 (annual operating budgets under $1 million) or $1500 (annual operating budgets over $1 million) towards the consultation, and KAL pays the remainder of the cost. During the first year 77 grants averaging roughly $23,000 each were made.

KAL maintains the web-based College of Consultants, a national, vetted database of highly skilled consultants, and grantees may use it to locate the help they need. Information on how to secure and work with consultants is also available, along with handouts from convenings.

KAL convenings address topics of interest to larger numbers of KAL participants. They are structured to allow participants to learn from and with their peers. Two formats are used: in-person trainings and web-based or video-based presentations that participants can access from their offices. Typically the in-person convenings involve a day and a half of learning opportunities, and they are offered at various sites across the U.S.

KAL also operates the Innovative Practice Fund and Product Dissemination initiative, which is providing 10 to 15 grants to nonprofits, funders or capacity-building providers (including WKKF grantees or non-WKKF organizations) to develop and disseminate innovative capacity-building knowledge, services and tools that fill service or knowledge gaps in the sector. As new tools and knowledge resources are developed through this fund, they will be packaged and disseminated to the nonprofit sector.

Knowledge resource grantees are sent a short evaluation form six months after receiving their check by Decision Information Resources (DIR), KAL's evaluator. It asks how the money was spent and what impact the resources had on the organization. Consultation grant recipients submit a report 30 days after their consultation is completed, and participate in KAL evaluation. Additionally, the consultants who work with grantees and the three KAL partners are interviewed by DIR as part of the evaluation process. A first year evaluation of KAL was completed in August 2008.

KAL's initial grant from WKKF ends in 2009, and a proposal for a second grant to continue KAL will be decided upon in July of 2009.

Contact Name:

Ron McKinley

Title:

Project Director

Phone:

(651) 556-4652

Fax:

(651) 556-4517

E-mail Address:

kal@fieldstonealliance.org

URL:

www.kal.org

Address:

60 Plato Boulevard East, Suite 150
Saint Paul, MN 55107


Date Program Began:

2006

Total Funds Awarded for Most Recent Fiscal Year:

$1,800,000

Date Program Scheduled to End:


N/A

Total Capacity-Building Operating Expenses for Most Recent
Fiscal Year:


$742,360


How Program is Operated:

Run internally by the intermediary
Delivered by another organization that the intermediary funds


Number Staff/Consultants:

3.5/5

Background Materials Available:

Yes


Geographic Areas Served:

National:

Yes

International:

No

 

  Selected States:

N/A

  Geographic Details:

N/A


Types of Capacity-Building Assistance Offered to Nonprofits:

1. Grants:

2. Direct Service:

3. Direct Financial Support:

Categorical

Convening
Education/Training for Groups of Nonprofits
Information and Referral
Website with Capacity-Building Assistance

N/A


Grants Offered to Capacity-Building Service
Providers and Intermediaries:

  Support for Services to Nonprofits:

N/A

  General Support:

N/A

Grants Offered to Support Overall Capacity-Building Infrastructure:

Local, State/Regional, National


Areas of Nonprofit Operations Supported:

How Funding/Service Decisions Are Made:

Administration + Finance
Communication (Internal/External)
Evaluation
Facilities Management
Fund Development
Governance (Board/Executive)
Human Resources
Information/Technology Support
Legal/Risk Management
Planning
Staff Development/Training

Application by Potential Recipient – Intermediary Selection


Collaborating Organizations: Nonprofit Finance Fund, Fieldstone Alliance, Kellogg Foundation

Capacity-Building Work Evaluated:

In Progress

Evaluation Results Available:

Yes

Frequency of Evaluation:

Ongoing

Type of Evaluation:

External, Surveys, Interviews, Document Reviews, Site Visits, Grantee Self-Reports

Summary of Evaluation Lessons Learned:
The following lessons learned were among those reported by this program:
  • Small investments in capacity building can make meaningful differences. Grantees report that having as little as $750 for the purchase of knowledge resources can make a meaningful difference in organizations.
     
  • Grantees' capacity-building needs are complex. While some apply and receive funding for one targeted capacity-building service, many benefit from a bundled or phased approach in which they work with a consultant to address multiple issues simultaneously (e.g. developing strategic marketing while developing a fundraising plan) or complete one consultation with a next step in mind (e.g. an organizational assessment serving as the foundation for a strategic planning process).
     
  • Grantees benefit from guidance as they decide what type of capacity-building consultation to undertake. Grantees spoke highly of the intake call to help further clarify their most important capacity-building issue. Often they come out of this conversation seeking a consultant to help them with different or additional consultative services that they didn't foresee needing when they entered the process.
     
  • Many grantees who received a combination assessment of their entire organization reported that it helped them identify strengths and weaknesses in their organization. For example, grantees reported that the Organizational Assessment helped them identify the need to improve specific staffing areas, build cross-class leadership models of giving, or tie their budgets to their strategic plans. Similarly, grantees stated that the Nonprofit Business Assessment helped them identify the need to strengthen financial operations and communications, identify where money is being lost, or align their financial systems with their organizational growth.
     
  • Combining the consultation models of two well-respected organizations into one theory of change is challenging. The effort is moving in a positive direction, and continuing work is needed to enable Fieldstone Alliance and the Nonprofit Finance Fund to develop a maximally effective collaborative undertaking.
In addition, evaluation results indicated the following as some of the significant impacts from this program:
  • The majority of organizations with budgets under $1 million who received knowledge resource grants reported that this benefitted or made a meaningful difference to their organization in the following areas: strengthened working relationships among community partners, increased community awareness, improved program and strategic planning, strengthened program evaluation, developed new or more efficient financial systems, generated new products for communities, enhanced professional development and knowledge for staff, developed new funding sources, and expanded outreach, fundraising and technological capacities.
     
  • Grantees reported substantial value from consultation grants, including increased capacity and specific impact in the following areas: clarified capacity-building priorities, clarified how boards should work, rewrote by-laws, reconstituted board, tracked finances, clarified mission, provided fundraising education, enhanced financial sustainability, identified more unrestricted revenue, organized a more efficient board, enhanced board and staff relations, made positive changes in organizational culture, and facilitated receipt of pro bono services.

Copyright © 2010 Human Interaction Research Institute  www.humaninteract.org