PHILANTHROPIC CAPACITY-BUILDING RESOURCES
DATABASE - INTERMEDIARY ORGANIZATIONS
Return to
Intermediaries Page
 
Report Title: Intermediary Profile Report
Report Date:

Organization:
 

Neighborhood Partnerships

Program ID Number: I-10

Date Profile Created:
 


December 1, 2005

Date Profile
Last Updated:
October 10, 2010


Program Summary:
(Completed program) Neighborhood Partnership Fund (NPF) supported the creation of affordable homes, healthy communities, and economic opportunities for low-income Oregonians. It accomplished this through (1) assistance to community development corporations (CDCs); (2) support for resident services; (3) human capital development, training and technical assistance; and (4) policy and advocacy work.

NPF was the lead agency in two public-private funding collaboratives that also involve the City of Portland, the State of Oregon, and the Enterprise Foundation. They were designed to support the work of CDCs and nonprofit affordable housing providers throughout Oregon. The collaboratives invested over $15 million in capacity-building grants to nonprofit community-based developers in Oregon since 1990, as well as providing technical assistance to grantees. Additionally, recognizing that resident services were essential to ensure the success of affordable housing, NPF began the Resident Services Initiative Demonstration Project in 2004. The project included: (1) capacity investments to ten CDCs to build organizational capacity to successfully operate resident service programs; (2) training and technical assistance to help build the skills of Resident Services Coordinators; and (3) independent evaluation to help describe and demonstrate the impact of resident service programs on CDC organizational health and on the lives of people who live in CDC housing.

In the area of training and technical assistance, NPF offered: (1) executive director retreats regionally and nationally for CDC Executives; (2) training on topics requested by grantees, including Succession Planning for Successful Transitions, Inclusivity, Persuasion & Influence, and other topics; (3) appreciative inquiry - working with organizations to explore opportunities for change and organizational growth using this new model; and (4) a training summit to evaluate local training capacity, identify gaps, and increase coordination and collaboration between training organizations.

NPF's Policy Initiative worked to build a strong base of support for affordable housing by: (1) increasing the capacity of housing advocates to make the case for expanded resources for affordable housing development; (2) identifying and supporting housing leaders and emerging leaders through skills training, coaching, and creation of support networks; (3) developing a stronger network of advocates within key regions of the state; (4) creating awareness on the part of key decision-makers and legislators about the need for affordable housing; and (5) inspiring passion for creative solutions to the affordable housing funding crisis on the part of advocates, supporters, and policy makers. The initiative worked toward these goals by developing effective messages and providing media advocacy training, providing training and technical assistance to local and regional housing advocacy networks, and creating a state-wide Housing Alliance.

NPF was also involved in development of a financial self-evaluation tool for CDCs. The self-evaluation tool allowed users to compare their financial performance to that of similar organizations and an industry standard. Evaluation of its own work typically involved internal methods used to examine specific projects. Results from an external evaluation of the resident services work were made available during the first quarter of 2006.

Contact Name:

Janet Byrd

Title:

Executive Director

Phone:

(503) 226-3001 ext. 103

Fax:

(503) 226-3027

E-mail Address:

jbyrd@neighborhoodpartnerships.org

URL:

www.tnpf.org

Address:

1020 SW Taylor, Suite 680
Portland, OR 97205


Date Program Began:

1990

Total Funds Awarded for Most Recent Fiscal Year:

$750,000

Date Program Scheduled to End:


N/A

Total Capacity-Building Operating Expenses for Most Recent
Fiscal Year:


$50,000


How Program is Operated:

Run internally by the intermediary


Number Staff/Consultants:

5/6

Background Materials Available:

Yes


Geographic Areas Served:

National:

No

International:

No

 

  Selected States:

Oregon

  Geographic Details:

N/A


Types of Capacity-Building Assistance Offered to Nonprofits:

1. Grants:

2. Direct Service:

3. Direct Financial Support:

Categorical
Part of Larger Grant

Assessment of Service Needs
Coaching/Training for Individual Nonprofits
Convening
Education/Training for Groups of Nonprofits
Information and Referral
Infrastructure for Peer Networking
Participation in Community Capacity-Building Initiative
Placing Funder Representatives on Nonprofit Boards
Website with Capacity-Building Assistance

Facilities/Equipment Support
General Operating Support


Grants Offered to Capacity-Building Service
Providers and Intermediaries:

  Support for Services to Nonprofits:

Yes

  General Support:

N/A

Grants Offered to Support Overall Capacity-Building Infrastructure:

N/A


Areas of Nonprofit Operations Supported:

How Funding/Service Decisions Are Made:

Administration + Finance
Communication (Internal/External)
Evaluation
Facilities Management
Fund Development
Governance (Board/Executive)
Human Resources
Information/Technology Support
Legal/Risk Management
Planning
Staff Development/Training

Application by Potential Recipient – Intermediary Selection
Pro-active Identification of Applicants by Intermediary


Collaborating Organizations: N/A

Capacity-Building Work Evaluated:

In Progress

Evaluation Results Available:

No

Frequency of Evaluation:

As Needed

Type of Evaluation:

N/A

Summary of Evaluation Lessons Learned:
The following lessons learned were among those reported by this program:
  • A holistic approach is important - focusing on leadership, adaptive thinking, management skills, and an organization's role in the community. This is tougher to do, but provides a solid grounding.
     
  • The four capacities being focused upon, as developed by the Marguerite Casey Foundation, resonate well with participants.
     
  • Repetition and multiple levels of learning are important.
     
  • Capacity-building work is hard and time consuming.
     
  • Repetition and multiple levels of learning are important.
     
  • The three-year length of this program is important. Participants value the consistency, and the ability to dig deeper into the four capacities.
     
  • It is very important that that the initial assessment and selection process be done right to lay a groundwork for success.
     
  • After the first year, participants are talking differently about their work, using more strategic thinking.
It is too early to identify specific impacts from the intermediary's activities.

Copyright © 2010 Human Interaction Research Institute  www.humaninteract.org