PHILANTHROPIC CAPACITY-BUILDING RESOURCES
DATABASE - INTERMEDIARY ORGANIZATIONS
Return to
Intermediaries Page
 
Report Title: Intermediary Profile Report
Report Date:

Organization:
 

Neighborhood Progress

Program ID Number: I-21

Date Profile Created:
 


June 30, 2009

Date Profile
Last Updated:
June 24, 2010


Program Summary:
Neighborhood Progress (NP) grew out of a partnership initially involving the Ford Foundation and Cleveland Tomorrow, a group of 30 chief executives from Northeast Ohio's largest corporations. Three Cleveland-based foundations, the Cleveland Foundation, the George Gund Foundation, and the Mandel Foundation were also involved in NPI's development and continue to provide funding. NP works to restore the health and prosperity of Cleveland's neighborhoods through an array of catalytic programs and services, including: (1) the Cleveland Neighborhood Partnership Program providing general operating support along with research and development assistance for community development corporations (CDCs) to implement neighborhood revitalization agendas based on identified priorities; (2) capacity-building training and organizational development activities to strengthen and empower community-based organizations; (3) financing for residential, retail, commercial, and industrial development; and (4) planning, designing, and developing larger scale housing, retail and commercial projects. Its programs are developed currently in partnership with community development corporations, the City of Cleveland, the philanthropic and corporate community, private developers and financial institutions.

Village Capital Corporation, a nonprofit subsidiary of NP, is the financing arm that provides dollars for real estate to CDCs and for-profits doing community development work in the city of Cleveland. New Village Corporation, also a nonprofit subsidiary under NP, is the real estate development arm, taking on projects and assisting CDCs that don't have the capacity to operate large scale housing or commercial projects on their own. It provides predevelopment and construction loans.

NP also provides an Executive Leadership Institute for executive directors and associate executive directors, working collaboratively with LISC. This involves three sessions with consultants, followed by work on personal professional development with individual coaches over the next year. In addition, NP staff members serve as resource providers to CDCs, and are integrated into some CDC activities. For example, they staff some CDC activities such as community meetings and planning processes. Both consultants and internal staff are used at NP trainings, which may be sponsored through the Cleveland Neighborhood Development Coalition.

The core operating support NP offers involves a competitive process and a three-year grant cycle. Sixteen CDCs in Cleveland are funded currently; six of them are part of a pilot Strategic Investment Initiative. $1.7 million is given annually to the 16 CDCs for core operating support - the top six groups each get $150,000 annually; $100,000 is given to the four mid-tier groups, and $60,000 each goes to the rest. An additional $2.8 million goes to the six in the pilot initiative; they also receive specialized training, and each group can use $5,000 to purchase additional training they want for capacity-building purposes.

The Strategic Investment Initiative is a market recovery approach that has the six CDCs each target a small focus area, leveraging resources to do comprehensive community development. They work to retain current residents, attract new ones, and create neighborhoods of choice. NP assists the CDCs with planning processes in the six neighborhoods. 40+ units of housing serve as an anchor within each neighborhood. One element of this is a model block strategy, training CDC staff to teach people how to look at a neighborhood in a positive light, and get residents involved in making positive change. Groups identify priority needs and actionable items, then receive help finding resources to implement the actions. As one example, NP is working with a library and school to build new facilities in an empty site within one of the neighborhoods.

Research and development for the Initiative includes creation of land assembly plans in each of the six areas to acquire vacant properties around the anchor projects, and work with Cleveland Public Art and Parks Works - two nonprofits - to use the vacant lots in creative ways until permanent uses of them are developed. Each group has a menu of possible work, and as it is ready and sees a particularly important need, NP can provide additional money for staff support with community organizing, staff training, etc. Development of marketing plans for the neighborhoods is next. They have done market niche analysis regarding competition and other elements, now are developing individual marketing plans for the neighborhoods.

Partnerships are built with surrounding areas, institutions, and the private sector as part of the Initiative. For example, Charter One Bank committed $150 million for economic and community development in the Greater University Circle area via housing loans, grants, and small business loans. It is collaborating with CDCs, cultural organizations, neighborhood groups, foundations and others in this effort.

In its work NP measures baselines and then tracks its impact over time. Evaluation includes quarterly reports, site visits, production reports, and other elements. Every three years the major funders bring in external reviewers who make recommendations about the level of funding NP should receive, the number of groups NP should fund, and whether the system is working, having an impact, and should continue.

Contact Name:

Walter W. Wright

Title:

Senior Program Officer

Phone:

(216) 830-2700 ext. 215

Fax:

(216) 830-2767

E-mail Address:

www@neighborhoodprogress.org

URL:

www.neighborhoodprogress.org

Address:

1956 West 25th Street, Suite 200
Cleveland, OH 44113


Date Program Began:

1988

Total Funds Awarded for Most Recent Fiscal Year:

$2,500,000

Date Program Scheduled to End:


N/A

Total Capacity-Building Operating Expenses for Most Recent
Fiscal Year:


$400,000


How Program is Operated:

Run internally by the intermediary
Delivered by another organization that the intermediary funds


Number Staff/Consultants:

4/6

Background Materials Available:

Yes


Geographic Areas Served:

National:

No

International:

No

 

  Selected States:

Ohio

  Geographic Details:

City of Cleveland


Types of Capacity-Building Assistance Offered to Nonprofits:

1. Grants:

2. Direct Service:

3. Direct Financial Support:

Categorical
Part of Larger Grant

Assessment of Service Needs
Coaching/Training for Individual Nonprofits
Convening
Education/Training for Groups of Nonprofits
Information and Referral
Infrastructure for Peer Networking
Participation in Community Capacity-Building Initiative
Website with Capacity-Building Assistance

Facilities/Equipment Support
General Operating Support Loans


Grants Offered to Capacity-Building Service
Providers and Intermediaries:

  Support for Services to Nonprofits:

Yes

  General Support:

N/A

Grants Offered to Support Overall Capacity-Building Infrastructure:

Local, State/Regional


Areas of Nonprofit Operations Supported:

How Funding/Service Decisions Are Made:

Administration + Finance
Communication (Internal/External)
Facilities Management
Fund Development
Governance (Board/Executive)
Human Resources
Information/Technology Support
Legal/Risk Management
Planning
Staff Development/Training

Application by Potential Recipient – Intermediary Selection
Application by Potential Recipient – Outside Selection


Collaborating Organizations: N/A

Capacity-Building Work Evaluated:

Yes

Evaluation Results Available:

Yes

Frequency of Evaluation:

Quarterly

Type of Evaluation:

External, Surveys, Interviews, Document Reviews, Grantee Self-Reports

Summary of Evaluation Lessons Learned:
The following lessons learned were among those reported by this program:
  • As a result of an internal organizational development effort in 2007, NP re-focused some of its work to respond to changes in its field. It began focusing more on responding to the needs of organizations with capacity to deliver their performance goals, and on using their ability to build out the capacity of those around them (essentially becoming mini-intermediaries or lead organizations in their parts of the city or region).
     
  • The Organizational Development work also identified the following key learnings/priorities:

    - Focus capacity-building on each organization's specific needs, concentrating on growth that positively impacts the project(s) in which NP is currently investing. (However, because capacity issues are less general and more specific to each group, this means fewer opportunities for economies of scale, and more expensive services.)

    - One-on-one coaching and direct technical assistance from NP staff that is unique and specific to the needs of an organization and community are especially valued and effective.

    - Peer learning opportunities should be supported as much as possible. These opportunities are important to those interviewed and are cost-effective ways to increase overall capacity. It is important to orovide financial resources and create/facilitate events for targeted information-sharing and learning. This is important not simply for learning, but as a place to share struggles and build relationships that support collaborative partnerships and begin conversations for mergers as financial resources increasingly become scarce.

    - Support and build partnerships with other support organizations (for NP) and among the CDCs. NP has the capacity to build stronger partnerships with service organizations, universities, companies, and other institutions to negotiate lower costs for everything from college courses to technical assistance resources.

    - Intervene in and play a role in removing road blocks, from working with the City to insure timely reimbursements and shared reporting mechanisms, to organizing CDCs and speaking out against regional decisions like sprawl that impact the urban core.

Copyright © 2010 Human Interaction Research Institute  www.humaninteract.org